10 Votes in Poll
Now, this was very productive. At least I made it clear that you were wrong about halfswording, and that you should clear up some definitions, and that this poll was not very clear on its wording.
Thank you for enlightening me about vanilla mechanics on the Aetherian wiki.
"its confirmed its a technique. Therefore it cannot be passive."
Confirmed by what exactly? that was what i was thinking. if you had went ahead and told me ck confirmed it i wouldnt have argued
I should do that myself later. I do recall seeing that swords had the same pixels, but it is not confirmed whether or not they match
Muchas gracias
Do keep in mind tho ck may not have been paying attention to technicalities when he was illustrating swords and the like, so if they dont match the 16 x √2 pixels be sure to ask ck abt it
Thank you for enlightening me about vanilla mechanics on the Aetherian wiki.
Your very welcome, as i have told you that these vanilla mechanics are part of aetheria aswell
(it took me an unbelievable amount of time to type that im getting really tired)
Now if youll excusez moi i must be going to bed
No regrets having this convo YOLO
If I said confirmed, what could it be confirmed by besides CK? You went on about something too, so I doubt that's what you were thinking.
I might ask CK about sword dimensions at some point, but I'm pretty sure the classic sword showed up a couple times in recent books where it is likely he payed attention, might look there and compare it to other things.
Don't respond
Ur literally tempting me olive
Anyway why did i ever think i needed an alt i have olive, my third eye
If I said confirmed, what could it be confirmed by besides CK? You went on about something too, so I doubt that's what you were thinking.
Noted, but at the time i you hadnt specified it yet so i tried to be openminded and thought perhaps you ran calculations as well and came to a conclusion, which was so unrealistic (in aetherian terms) that i thought my idea was more reasonable than yours