23 Votes in Poll
No you don't. Not all advanced classes have a specific basic class
Tiers don't have a defining definition, meaning that you could change the tiers all you want, put classes in any tier, it wouldn't really make a difference except confuse everyone
Anyone can get the shinobi class, if we used my 2-tier system, nothing would change except that it emphasizes on the fact that shinobi has little to no requirements
I'm going for 2 tier. It sounds simpler. And we wold only have to add a 3rd tier if there was a class the requires a 2nd tier class.
The 3-tier does emphasize on rarity and a bit in specialty, which is why I didn't go for the 2nd tier in the vote.
Although I do like the 2-tier better than 5 tier, I'm still going for 3-tier. It's the one that will cause less confusion and squabbling.
Also theirs no 2 tier option.
Oooooooooooooooooooooo kool whatd i miss out on?
Whats the 3 tier class?
Im thinkin we could do a merge between the two maybe?
For example so and so tiers in the t5 system fall into so and so tiers in the t3 system?
Im thinkin the t3 system on top, cos we gotta plan ahead: in the future, once ck introduces the t3 system, he'll begin to use it more and more frequently, so readers that refer here are gonna be more and more confused.
As for the t5 sys, you can use it but mainly for descriptive purposes; t3 sys should be the most visible, with t5 being an underlying feature for people looking to create characters and such
Wow this caused some attention
I think I'll support the 3-tier. I was already confused by the 5-tier system before this came out. I like this.
What do you think?