Otherwise, we might as well change description to appearance.

It has been too long since we last went over this, so I apologize if you have to repeat the same points from before.

The other problem is that difficultly is a terrible way to represent "Non attacking abilities." So please rename that.

The difficulty is also neutrality.

That wasn't the only problem

HEEEYY I HAVE AN IDEA

SO YKNOW HOW CK MAKES IT AN IMAGE (of a book page)

So make an image for a template

And when someone needs to add a monsta, they can take the template, put some textboxes (and an image of said monsta) and take a screenshot

Obviously it would look better if we could add an interactive slider that looks like a book extra stuff using js but the js on this wiki (and ucp in general) is pretty screwed up rn so we gotta use images

I suppose we could incorporate it with a slider and some images, although it would be rather annoying to make edits so thats why i proposed the slider template idea, where you could have a text-based template instead of images that are hard to edit on a slider.

No, because

1. It contradicts Lunts idea (and mine too) of taking too much space

2. It takes too much space

3. We shouldnt have an entirely different page just for related weapons

Number three doesnt criticize the format

The mini infobox would only be for weapons deserving of their own section (say, eventide).

And it would have to be very mini or the related weapons section/page would be very, very, clogged as the series continues.

Thats two reasons, not 3.