23 Votes in Poll
In addition, there's no way CK would base off Entity and Herobrine off Entity303 and Herobrine in Vanilla minecraft lore (or whatever it is). You can cross off that idea
Oki doki
Wut thats not true
Some of it is derived from their creepypasta versions
Especially herobrine
Also, when observing humans' stories about the aetheria server, you can sorta tell that pvp was allowed. Therefore, herobrine is not breaking divine law by killing, torturing, modifying, or doing other things to players, NPCs, and mobs
Herobrine doesn't need to follow divine law, he isn't an immortal. Only immortals must follow it. So no, Herobrine isn't breaking divine law, since it doesn't affect him in the first place.
Sorry
By divine law i meant herobrine was not committing any sins punishable under divine law
Wut thats not true
Only the name and the appearance was copied over. You have had conversation with CK before, so I think you would know this, but CK is very much against copying. Just because another litrpg had the name "firebolt" in it, he didn't want to use it as a spell (or at least mention it again). Similar thing with otherworlder
No i meant, copied herobrines attitude, his presence/aura, etc
Compared to creepypasta entity 303, the entity in the books is way different
On the other hand, aetheria herobrine could almost be a replacement for creepypasta herobrine
I don't know anything about creepypasta herobrine so I wouldn't comment on the similarities, but there wouldn't be much from now on.
By divine law i meant herobrine was not committing any sins punishable under divine law
If Herobrine were Immortal he would have been punished. Divine law forbids Immortals from doing anything in the mortal realms except granting favors, the occasional dream/vision, and the "champion" stuff (maybe there's a few more small things but that's pretty much it).
What do you think?